Sunday, June 30, 2013

Radical Muslim Islam

Once again terror has knocked on our door and I ask followers of the Muslim faith, living within our shores as members of our community, to reject any Imam preaching jihad in your mosque, or sympathizing with radical Islamic tenet.

You are your brother's keeper and claimants of your faith are committing heinous and savage deeds in your name; perceived by other civilized people as coming from an inhumane and savage religion. Some passages in your holy book refers to non Muslims as infidels, therefore you must rise up and take the lead. No one better than you knows the mind set of these primitive thinkers.

Over a billion Muslims reside worldwide in peace, save for a growing section of radicals that are the bad seeds in a family. It is the child you neglected into evil company, going astray and must regain control of. Putting lipstick on a pig to pass it off as something other than what it really is is still a pig and jihad and Sharia are synonymous contributors to violence and terror.

The horror befalling the world by groups with names like al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah and Muslim Brotherhood create havoc to the masses of peace loving people. By not standing up to them, or support them, you put your family and children in danger too, because they do not celebrate life, but rejoice in death; thinking 72 virgins await them in Jannah (heaven). It must be concluded by any measure that they are insane, or the average intelligence of a Jihadist hovers below 20% of that of a moron's I.Q. Murder is an irrational act and their paradise will instead be Jahannam (hell).

Radical Islam is a deadly disease and because the name of your faith may sound the same, you are not immune to its poison, as proof by 9/11. It doesn't concern them if you become collateral casualties.

The leaders of this kind of Islam use their brain washed followers to do their dirty work.... innocent children as suicide bombs and hapless women to do their bidding.

Undeniably radical cells do exist here and funded by Wahhabi money, to undermined our American, Judeo/Christian values. It sets up madrasas like the Gulen Charter Schools, indoctrinating unsuspecting minds of the young. Parents be wary that your children are receiving tools to broaden their horizons, not poison to further the ambitions of unscrupulous men hiding under the guise of clergy. Not unlike the Spanish Inquisitions.

If the serene, good intentioned and decent souls of Islam don't evolve into the twenty-first century, it will perish in the rubble of its own violence of terror. To describe low life and garbage, there is no better example than the perverted Muslim fundamentalist radical Islamist......five words, hard for anyone to swallow.

The Boston Marathon showed us terrorists come in all colors and from around the world; but the common denominator is Islam and damage done to it must be scrubbed and repaired, not white washed.

We have ultra liberal factions in academia and politics who call them freedom fighters, and refuse to refer to them as terrorists.

With the senseless murder of Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, Lee Rigby being the U.K.'s latest victim, it is evident all Muslims who deplore these acts of terror, throughout the world, must rise and demand, enough is enough and rid this infestation of contamination from their faith.

Conservative commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Are They Trying to “Lynch” George Zimmerman?

The term “lynching” carries with it some unsavory memories of times gone by in our country. Today, we have not seen “lynchings” like some of our fellow citizens forebears had happen to them, in many years past. But, the symbol of a “lynching” can very readily be resurrected when we zero in on the case of George Zimmerman, a Community Watch volunteer, who is charged with 2nd degree murder against black teenager, Trayvon Martin.

The unfortunate incident in question happened on Feb. 26, 2012 in a gated community in Sanford, Florida.

The scene went like this - George Zimmerman, upon doing his rounds in the community, noticed a hooded figure acting suspiciously in the community (there had been a number of break-ins recently in the neighborhood), so his antenna went up. As he was approaching this hooded figure, he called 911 to report this suspicious behavior he had observed. During this time, some words were exchanged between Zimmerman and the other person, we now know as Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman was informed that the police were on their way and he was headed back to his car after the 911 operator told him to stop following the suspicious person. During his conversation with the 911 operator, the operator asked if he could tell who this person was and what was the color of the person. Zimmerman said he couldn’t tell, but that he might be black. (So much for the “racial profiling” accusation). At some point while he was headed back to his car, Zimmerman was confronted and attacked by Trayvon Martin and was thrown to the ground with Martin on top of him throwing punches and banging Zimmerman’s head against the sidewalk. During this attack, Zimmerman, who had a legal permit to carry a firearm, pulled it out and gave off one shot which hit Martin in the chest killing him. When the police arrived within minutes of the shooting, and saw what had happened, and the fact that Zimmerman had a broken nose, and wounds to his head, his story seemed , to the police, that Zimmerman’s use of his licensed gun to protect himself from further harm or possibly death, was an act of self-defense. The police did not arrest him at that time. Witnesses near the crime scene also verified that it was Zimmerman, being straddled by Martin, who was taking the beating.

In the weeks following the incident, outside agitators like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Rep. Frederica Wilson, and the New Black Panther Party, came to town to demand the arrest of George Zimmerman, and the highly inflammatory word of “racism” was introduced into the case, thinking that Zimmerman was a “lily white” vigilante, hell-bent on taking the life of an “innocent” black teenager for no apparent reason. (Later on it turned out that Zimmerman was not “lily white”, but was part Hispanic who had a black grandparent, (but it made no difference to the “racial arsonists“ who had their minds already made up that Zimmerman was guilty, so did much of the liberal media).

This pressure on the authorities by these outside agitators, caused the police, after a few weeks, to arrest Zimmerman, which they did, and then the State Attorney stepped in to charge Zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. The agitators stirred up the black community by claiming that this was another case of a “white profiling” of a black person, and in fact, the New Black Panther Party offered a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman before his arrest. The Zimmerman family was also threatened with bodily harm, even up until today.

Most of the evidence that has come out, in the media since the incident, seems to be exculpatory of the actions of Zimmerman on that night, but the “race hustlers”, regardless of the facts, want nothing less than a murder conviction of Zimmerman - in other words, they want to “lynch” him, the facts be damned.

The trial is now in progress. Let’s hope the judicial system works free and clear of any outside pressure by special interest groups in trying to taint the verdict, one way or the other. “Political correctness” should not raise its ugly head in the adjudication of this matter, but we shall see. Stay tuned.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 23, 2013

MORT’s meanderings

Muslim heritage in America?
What did I miss and when did I miss it?   

Did I miss the Muslim patriots who helped George Washington defeat the British forces sent to quell the Colonists who’d finally had enough of King George III’s tyrannical oppression?  Surely there were hundreds of them.  I’ve read accounts of the American Revolution but, must have missed that part.
Did I miss the Muslim patriots who met with those brave Revolutionaries to help them write the Declaration of Independence?  Surely, there must have been one among the ‘Signers’.  Hmm?
Did I miss the Muslim patriots who joined the Founding Fathers to create The Constitution of the United States?  I’m guessing there must have been at least a dozen.  Damn, missed that too.
Did I miss the Muslim patriots who joined with President Thomas Jefferson to fight the Barbary Pirates as they plundered American merchant ships and murdered American sailors?  Those pirates were Muslims, too – but, you knew that, didn’tcha?  If not, read up on that history; you’ll love it.
Did I miss the Muslim patriots who served in the Union Army during the Civil War, helping President Lincoln preserve the unity of the nation?  I’ve studied that conflict but can’t recall any mention of a General McMuslim, a Private Muhammud or a Corporal Barack - nary a one, on either side.
Did I miss all the many Muslim patriots who served in the U.S. Armed Forces during World War II, to defeat the forces of Fascism throughout the world? There were American Indians speaking in code;  Japanese in the U.S. Army serving in Italy; and more Italian-Americans in our military than any other group of hyphenated-American patriots – plus, some representation of every imaginable race, religion & creed from all across this great nation.  But, if there was a heroic, patriotic Muslim among them, I’ve never heard of him or seen any mention of his exploits.  Must  have missed that, too.
CAIR’s most articulate spokesman – the one with the Teleprompter, keeps spewing out screeds of ‘Muslim heritage in America’ spin.  Ain’t no such thing, Folks.  We poor, stupid Americans – a people who unfailingly want to think the best of our fellow man – we are our own worst enemy.
We swallow Muslim / Islam horseshit as if it were pure honey.  We permit the diabolically clever, lunatic operatives of Islam, who are exceedingly adept at spinning public relations – and the gullible / complicit media, to shape our thinking.  And thus, our impression of these bloodthirsty miscreants is warped  and bent  like so many wet twigs. Are we stupid?  Are we nuts?  Let me guess.
Think of the hundreds of cowardly attacks on American people and property around the world over just the last 30 years.  Think of ‘911’.  Can there be a single doubt in anyone’s mind that Muslim / Islam is the scourge of the Earth?  Muslim heritage?  Who are they kidding?  They’ll have to get in line to be kidding us – we are there, first in line– smiling stupidlykidding ourselves.
MORT KUFF  © 6-18-2013

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Nobody Asked Me, but.….Part 8

* How can sane people not think that our President, Barack Hussein Obama, was not a principal player in all the scandals surrounding the White Hose such as; Fast & Furious, the IRS auditing and harassing of conservative groups, the spying on AP and Fox reporters e-mails and phone logs, and the cover-up of the Benghazi murders? Isn’t the circumstantial evidence overwhelming? Was Liberace gay?

* Why is there such a push to legitimatize the “gay” lifestyle as if they are the only group who has faced discrimination, both real or imagined? Are they really seeking tolerance or are they really seeking approval and justification of their promiscuous lifestyle as being normal?

* Why are people who advocate for smaller government and less government spending, a fairer tax system for all classes, adhering to the U.S. Constitution, repealing that monstrosity called Obamacare, and upholding the 1st and 2nd Amendments, considered to be un-American and enemies of the country (Re: Tea Party advocates and sympathizers)?

* Conversely, why do people (mostly liberals and progressives) who demonstrate and violate our laws (Occupy Wall Street) considered to be upstanding citizens just for voicing their opinions just like the Tea Party people? Is there a “double standard”? Is Michael Moore fat and ugly?

* Why do the powers-to-be in Wash. D.C., continue to throw roadblocks in the way of our country exploiting our own vast natural resources of natural gas, oil, and clean-burning coal, so that we can become completely energy independent, so that we don’t have to buy energy from countries who are our enemies, and who don’t like us?

* Why do Democrats want to make it easier for ineligible people to vote in our elections by being against simple voter I.D. laws, and by easing the requirements for non-legal people to vote? Could it be because most all these ineligible voters vote Democratic? Does Nancy Pelosi use Botox?

* Why don’t we have a contest as to who contributes more to society - Muslims or Jews? Let’s compare which side has the most hospitals and doctors, the most museums, the most Nobel prizes in science and technology, the most charitable organizations that actually help the poor, the most opera, symphonies, and ballet companies? I guess that wouldn’t be a fair contest, would it?

* Why is Islam considered a “peaceful” religion when the writings in the Koran condone mercy killings in families, the cutting off of limbs for petty crimes, for the stoning of women to death for adultery, the arrangement of marriages by grown men to pre-pubescent girls, the practice of “taquiyya” whereby the lying to a non-Muslim is looked upon favorably, and encouraging “jihad” around the world in the quest by Islam for total domination? Instead of being called a religion of peace, it should be considered a “theocratic political ideology” that wants to convert and enslave all non-Muslims.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 16, 2013

It's Raining Outside

If it's storming out and the wind is blowing rain into the house through
open windows, we will be sopping up water with a mop all day, while the
windows remain open.

How difficult is it to understand, that if we don't seal our borders, illegal
immigration will be a continuous problem.

Calling rain by a different name doesn't diminish the damage it creates.
Neither will anything change by political correctness.....renaming illegals
undocumented citizens; or referred to by conservative talk show host as
undocumented democrats.

It doesn't make sense to attempt repairing damage done by the rain, nor
determine what to do with millions of foreigners that disregarded
our laws
, entering the country illegally, or overstaying their visas.

The problem with the open windows and unsecured borders must be
attended to first, before anything else.

It's inevitable politics will influence the outcome of the current immigration
reform bill debated in congress, so any road to legalization must include and
stipulate that this generation in question will not be given the right to vote,
nor automatically be enrolled in government assisted programs.

As with rain, legal immigration is beneficial when controlled. Not enforcing
the laws already on the books is like a broken levee, flooding the country side
with unwanted debris, clogging our infrastructure and changing the face of
America as we knew it.

Conservative commentary from George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Friday, June 14, 2013

MORT’s meanderings

Gun Control  vs  People Control
Guns don’t have minds but, many people do. What’s so fair about that?
Guns cannot load themselves but, people with a mind to do harm, can.
Have you ever heard of a loaded gun picking up an empty person?  
A revolver can hold six shots without being a danger.  Can a person do that?
It takes a human finger to pull a trigger.  Ever hear of a gun firing a person?
A gun is aimless without a human to point it.  An aimless person is just as pointless.
A fully-loaded magazine without a gun is completely harmless.  
A fully-loaded person with a gun is a human disaster ready to happen.
Controlling a gun takes practice.  Self-control takes character – and far more practice.
A permit to carry is a safety measure.  A birth certificate?  Not so much.
The caliber of a gun is not as much of a concern as the caliber of the person carrying it.
A small bore weapon in the hands of a large bore person is just asking for trouble.
A gun can protect a person but, what is to protect people from a person with a gun?
A well-oiled gun in the hands of a well-oiled person is the worst kind of bad news.
If the answer is a gun, then the question being asked isn’t reasonable.  
A gun carried in plain view usually assures that common sense will prevail.
Let’s face it, a small woman is superior to a big man, whether or not she is carrying.  

Original thoughts on the subject by:
MORT KUFF  © 6-15-2013

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Is it Time to Get Rid of the IRS?

The term IRS sends shivers down the spine of most Americans. Should that be? How could one agency of the government exert such a fear on and in the people? Something smells rotten in Denmark (my apologies to Denmark).

Since the latest outrageous revelations about the actions of the IRS have come to light and have illuminated some of the abuses it has perpetrated upon different people and groups, it might be time for the IRS to be disbanded and our tax code reformed to make it fairer and less cumbersome for every citizen, whether rich or poor or in-between.

No government agency should be able to intimidate its citizens and threaten them. This is the United States of America not the Soviet Union or some two-bit tin horn dictatorship who routinely harass and intimidate its citizens in order to make them comply with the dictates of the government.

Remember the expression, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you”, well, I dare say, if you are from the IRS, most people would not think any help would be forthcoming, in fact, panic would set in. It shouldn’t be that way, but what the IRS has been accused of doing and what they have admitted to doing, that fear, on the part of the citizen, is well justified.

When you have thousands of pages of tax rules and regulations, the average person and the well-to-do person, can’t possibly understand all the complexities that the present tax code fosters. When something is complex and very difficult to understand, it invites hanky-panky and subterfuge in how the tax laws can be circumvented or ignored all together.

These present illegal and immoral revelations and allegations about the activities of the IRS, should be a propitious time to get rid of this ruthless (some might say “evil”) and out-of-control agency, and replace it with a much simpler form of a “flat tax” or a “fair tax”. This way the politicians and lobbyists cannot manipulate the system to benefit themselves, and to hell with the rest of us. A “moral” tax system is one where everyone pays toward the running of the government. There should be no “freeloaders” like there is now, whereby 47% of wage earners pay no federal income tax. Everyone, rich, poor, or middle-class, uses the services of the government (police, fire, national security etc.) so, therefore, everyone should contribute something (paying taxes)[’; toward its upkeep.

It was disgraceful that the IRS targeted individuals and groups that didn’t agree with the Obama Administration, and used its “might” to thwart and target those groups and individuals for obviously political purposes. This behavior had to be orchestrated from “on high” because a lowly group of “clerks” in Cincinnati couldn’t have been capable of doing what they did without getting a “wink and a nod” from higher ups. It wouldn’t surprise me that the Chicago thugs, in and around the White House, were responsible for doing what they did. Their fingerprints, in my opinion, are all over this outrageous behavior on the part of the IRS.

Let’s get rid of this agency, and its endemic corruption, once and for all.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 9, 2013

MORT’s meanderings

More ObamMoronix.*
Insane Hussein, our one-trick-pony president, has just done a repeat of his favorite tactic-of-choice – sticking it to the (R’s).   It’s what he does; it’s who he is - a very vindictive, partisan Democrat.      
He has selected Susan Rice as his National Security Advisor, an appointed position that does not require Congressional approval or consent.  Her qualifications for  the job?  What does that matter?
Since it had his tacit approval, he is well aware that  Rice’s infamous 5-stop tour of the Sunday news shows was a blatantly deliberate ploy to divert the nation’s attention from the terrible truth that  Obama was afraid could have a negative impact on his chances in the upcoming Presidential election.  He is also acutely aware that this choice of Susan Rice as his National Security Advisor has the effect of rubbing salt into the wound  felt by every Republican who sits in the Congress.  
Hold on a moment, I’ve just presumed to speak for some ‘establishment’ Republicans who it seems,  wish to hell they had the guts to renounce their (R) and replace it with a (D) just to be on the winning side..  I can’t really speak for them so, I guess I’ll have to take that back.  - - - done.
Another highly-questionable Obama appointment that was made in tandem with the rancid Rice debacle, is his naming Samantha Powers as the new U. S. Ambassador-ess to the UN.    Her qualifications for the job?  As former Secretary of State and the smartest woman ever to put on her husband’s pants, Hillary Clinton, famously questioned:   “What, at this point, does it matter?”  
Right-on,  Hillary.  Right-on.
It simply matters not, to Obama, what the ramifications of these questionable appointments might be -  he is just that detached from the actual workings of the government and the consequences of having such incompetents conducting the affairs of this nation.  Simply not  interested. He only brings his off-the-wall faculties into focus when there is an opportunity to, ‘stick it to the (R’s)’.  
He is obsessed with instant retaliation against any and all who have an opposing viewpoint. Do you recall during his State of the Nation speech, when he gave a tongue-lashing to the Members of the Supreme Court who were sitting right in front of the podium?   His Narcissistic ego cannot tolerate even the slightest response to his pronouncements that isn’t 100% in agreement.  Barack Hussein Obama is a small man with a streak of pettiness that is precisely as tall as he is, and a mile wide.
If this nation survives Insane Hussein’s interminable final term as President, one suggests that it might be a damned good idea to add a psychiatric exam to the list of qualifications for candidates who seek the Office of the Presidency.  Wouldst that could be done, retroactively. I give myself, an Amen.
MORT KUFF  © 6-6-2013
*  Manifestations of Obama’s Narcissistic thought processes  

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Is the “Peter Principle” Alive and Well in Wash. D.C.?

The definition of that term is that members of an organization where promotion is based on achievement, success, and merit, will eventually be promoted beyond their level of ability. In other words, “employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence”.

Does the term, “I don’t know” sound familiar? What about “I don’t recall”? Doesn’t that send shivers down your spine when someone in authority makes comments like that? Especially people in government who are supposed to be working for us, the taxpayers?

Look at what’s happening in Wash. D.C. where heads of government agencies or departments just can’t recall who, what, and where about practically anything of importance. How were these people selected or elected, with such faulty memories, to their jobs or positions in the first place? Not only do they get a pass from their hierarchy, but in many cases they get promoted (or relieved of duty with “pay”) thereby validating the precepts of the “Peter Principle”.

The major culprit in these very convenient cases of “selective amnesia” is none other than our “Liar in Chief”, Barack Hussein Obama. As the most powerful man in the most powerful country in the world (by reason of being president), how come he only finds out about wrongdoing or policy failures by reading it in the newspapers or watching it on T.V.? His “Zombie” supporters claim that he is the smartest man in the world, but he knows nothing about what’s going on around him. You’d think he was a lowly clerk in the White House instead of being the President of the United States. For a man who is the epitome of the “tireless” campaigner, who knows which way the political winds are blowing in order to gather political support for himself and his party, can you really believe he is in the dark on most anything that has gone wrong around him and his administration? How many times can the term “plausible deniability” be used to cover for this guy? Could it be that the lights are on in the White House, but nobody is home? It sure looks that way.

Look at the testimony of some of the big honcho’s in the Obama administration, just over the past few months and days. Attorney General Eric Holder knew nothing about Fast & Furious or the tapping of the phones and e-mails of the AP reporters and a Fox correspondent. Who me, I‘m just the Attorney General, the top law enforcement person in the country? Then there is the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who doesn’t know what happened before or after Ambassador Chris Stevens was murdered in Benghazi and then tried to tell us it was a “disgusting” video that caused all the mayhem. Really? And then there are the IRS officials who adamantly stated that they knew nothing about the auditing and harassment of conservative and religious groups who were critical of the Obama administration. These bureaucrats with the “selective memory problems”, not only weren’t punished (up until now), but in some cases were even promoted to new jobs.

Yes, the “Peter Principle” is alive and well in Wash. D.C. and a complete house cleaning is in order come the elections in 2014 and 2016. Winning elections “at all costs” doesn’t do our country any good, as the least competent seem to thrive in selling their ”snake oil” to the voters, but once in office and power, they haven’t a clue as to how to implement policies that are good for the citizens and our country, and then, very conveniently, can‘t remember what went wrong or who was at fault.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Do We Have a Void of Leadership in Washington?

A leader has a hands on approach by knowing what is going on under his
or her charge. A leader is on the front lines, directing operations toward
successful outcomes.

Prima donnas use others to carry the ball for them while they take credit
for successes and have them absorb blame for their failures. This present
administration has an ample amount of minions for that purpose and has
no shame to take credit for heroic endeavors by others unassociated to

It's an artful skill to dodge blame, as we are witnessing the congressional
hearings on Benghazi, IRS abuses, AP phone records and contempt of
congress stalling in the Operation Fast and Furious, waiting for documents.
Their tactics are the envy and admiration of every con artist.

Is it a federal offense to call a president a lying bastard, or a secretary
of state an opportunistic old bag, or an attorney general a two faced racist?
We have four public service patriots in their graves because those who were
suppose to watch their back were indifferent and too preoccupied with other
things. Briefly informing Hillary Clinton about an attack on our consulate
in Libya, there was no further inquiry or follow up and she was AWOL until
the following day. Notifying the president was an inconvenience, because he
said he had to turn in early to make a flight to Las Vegas for yet another
fund raiser.

This was like instructing his subordinates to tell those in danger in
Benghazi to take two aspirins and if the situation didn't improve, to call him
in the morning. But not too early.

A bunch of rowdy crowds, pissed about a YouTube film didn't warrant
disrupting their beauty sleep, schedules and routine, leaving it for others
who were miffed to know what to do.

As someone put it, when the fire alarm was tripped, the fire chief didn't
send out his engines because he wanted to know how bad the fire was and
wouldit be too dangerous, and maybe by the time his fire engines got there
it could be to late to save anything. As it turned out, the fire was left
to burn itself out.

I believe those in responsible positions. How could they possibly know
anything. They were not around to know what happened, by whom, when,
where or how.

But, "At this point, what difference does it make?" a quotation for history
like, "Let them eat cake!"

Conservative commentary by George Giftos

Bookmark and Share